If you answer yes to any one or more of these questions ---- I surmise your loved one and yourself have been discrimina ted against in violation of the ADA
1. Has your disabled
loved one/family member had an equal opportunity to participate in the
services programs and activities of the state court system ?
2. Has your disabled loved one/family member had an equal
opportunity to benefit from the services programs and activities of the
state court system ?
3. Has your disabled loved one/family member received services
of the state court system equal to those services provided to others ?
4. Has the state court system, as a public entity, excluded your
disabled loved one/family member from equal access to and equal
participation in the services programs and activities of the state court
system ?
5. Has the state court system, as a public entity, modified any
practice policy or procedure so as to ensure that your disabled loved
one/family member is not excluded and has equal access to, and an equal
opportunity to participate in and benefit from, the services programs
and activities of the state court system ?
6. Has the state court, as a public entity, aided and
perpetuated the discrimination of your disabled loved one/family member
by providing significant assistance to any agency organization or
persons who discriminate against your disabled loved one/family member
in the services programs and activities the agency organization or
persons provide to your disabled loved one/family member ?
7. Has the state court, as a pubic entity, rendered its
facilities inaccessible and unusable to your disabled loved one/family
member ?
8. Has the state court, as a public entity, provided any
auxiliary aids or services so as to ensure effective communication
between your disabled loved one/family member and the public entity, and
so as to ensure effective communication equal to the communications of
others participating in the services programs and activities of the
public entity ?
9. Has the state court, as a public entity, denied or deprived
your disabled loved one/family member (friends, companions and
associates included) of your emotional support and informed perspective ?
10. Has the state court, as a public entity, provided its
services programs and activities in the most integrated setting
appropriate to the needs of your disabled loved one/family member ?
11. Has the state court, as a public entity, resorted to
retaliation, coercion, threats, and intimidation to deny, and/or
interfered with, your disabled loved one/family member's full attainment
and enjoyment of their rights under the ADA ?
12. Has the state court, as a public entity, provided
"Notice" to you and your disabled loved one/family member of the rights
granted and protected by the ADA ?
You can ask yourself these same questions with regard to the
appointed guardian ---- the services programs and activities of the
state court (as a public entity) are separate and distinct from those
services programs and activities provided by the guardian --- the
guardian holds an appointed public office (agent of the court) and the
"guardianship" is itself a "public entity" which provides guardianship
services --- guardians do not provided judicial services ....
No comments:
Post a Comment